11/11/2022 0 Comments Jqbx alternative![]() However, when I made the first two screens, I noticed that something is off. Initially I started with a different concept. After some thinking I settled on the name “Compare taste”. I had to think of alternative name to communicate this feature. The initial name that I gave it was “See Compatibility”, placing it next to the “Follow/Following” button - I notice that the name was really long. ![]() I needed to make this concept more accessible and easier for users to discover it. However, it was hard to find it in there and from my experience so far, if you rely on the user to take the extra mile, he probably wouldn’t. Proceeding to the next possible solution in screen number three, I placed the compatibility feature behind the ellipsis icon. I was looking for a way to communicate the possibility to compare musical taste in a coherent way, sticking to Spotify design system and to what users are already familiar with in terms of visual style. ![]() While I liked the first option at the beginning, the icon I used wasn’t self-explanatory enough and it could lead to confusions. In this concept I toggled between five different options. Musical Matchesĭuring my interviews when I first mentioned ‘Musical Matches’ people asked me: “You are not making a musical Tinder, right?” and my reaction was In such scenario the user is getting nowhere. Another downside to this is, if people get notified, when they have listened to the same track at the same time, but have low compatibility between each other. ❌ Notify users when they have listened to the same song at the same timeĪlthough it seems like I’m getting rid of the most serendipitous idea among all, I didn’t want to move the emphasis away from the music to the people who listened to it. Without knowing, if their musical taste match up with the taste of another user, they don’t have the motivation needed to dig in and explore someone’s profile.Īt first, I really liked the idea of public discover weekly playlists, but that was before I know that Spotify describes Discover Weekly as “The playlist made just for you, every Monday.” As this playlist is meant to be personal, I thought it’s not a good idea to make it visible for others, just for the sake of finding new musical content through it. At the moment users can view their Spotify profiles, but don’t know, if their musical taste match up with another or not. The user profile is an opportunity area, which could serve, as a rabbit hole of never-ending musical content.Ĭompatibility feature serves as a stepping stone to find and connect musical matches. This feature could serve as a direct way for users to get to new musical content, through social-based discovery. Musical matches in terms of this case study are people with high compatibility between them. In this part of the redesign I prioritized the impact, over the effort. Starting from the possibility to create musical rooms, explore musical matches and compare musical taste all along to the opportunity to chat within the app and vote on songs, which match with users taste. In this competitive research I was looking for music streaming apps, which have implemented social-based discovery features and which brings people together through music in a number of ways. There is a desire for social-based discovery that is currently not met. ![]() Personalized music suggestions from Spotify come on a weekly basis. People want to discover new music at any given time based on what others listen to, but can’t because:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |